You may find DB's post to be humorous, but I find your comments to be likewise. Your words show that, like many people, you have no concept of the fundamentals of science.

Science is all about disproving things, not proving them. It's a basic fact that you can never actually show anything to be true, only false. No matter how much evidence you have in support of something, it takes only a single statement of fact to refute the lot. That's how the game is played. All propositions are subject to endless scrutiny by the community at large, and only those that survive attempts at refutation are accepted. Even then, they're only kept around so long as they continue to pass the tests.

Our so-called "laws" of science are only so because everyone who tests them gets the same results. Nobody is able to refute them. I guarantee you that as soon as a valid experiment comes along that generates different results, the landscape will change.

As for ATT, it is entirely possible that Mr. Wagner has created something noteworthy. However, his failure to submit his ideas for peer review suggests otherwise. I understand that he is wary of "the system," but his fears are entirely unfounded. If he really had something to show, he wouldn't have to worry about costly legal fees or theft of intellectual property. The world has many mechanisms in place to protect against the latter. As for the former, if he could really do what he claims, he would have a great many people handing him blank checks.

As a scientist, I must leave open the possibility that Mr. Wagner is telling the truth and has in fact developed something great for this world. Despite significant evidence that he's full of BS, it's always possible that something new will come to light tomorrow that will vindicate him. You'll understand if I don't hold my breath.