Comments on: Tachyon Energy for the Masses

By: Jayaram Rajaram

Jayaram Rajaram — Tue, 07 Feb 2012 08:12:28 +0000

I am a Keratoconus patient who has been using Tachyonised Water in my eyes for over 9 years now. I understand none of the scientific jargon, but do understand that experientially this product in addition to my Homoeopathy treatment and eye exercises have helped me lead a normal life with just specs for 10 years now! I haven't sold a single unit of any Tachyonised product this far even though I became an affiliate to get products at a discount. Science will never have all the answers. Most things in life have to be experienced and accepted.

By: Liz

Liz — Sun, 04 Dec 2011 18:04:11 +0000

Haha. Just read everyone's comments. Some people are so stupid. I wouldn't normally post on anything like this but I felt I had to say something. Yes, "tachyonisation" or whatever you want to call it is complete bullsh*t. I'm actually amazed anyone would buy anything after hearing that stuff. It doesn't even try to make sense, it's just trying to sound knowledgeable and intelligent to make potential customers trust him. However, having said that, if you believe it good luck to you - the placebo effect may well make you think you feel better. But I doubt it'll stop everyone getting cancer. By the way, I have a degree in physics so I also understand that the terminology used is simply wrong. Don't feel you have to take my word for it, but for God's sake please don't believe it will "heal" you either.

By: db

db — Thu, 29 Sep 2011 01:01:54 +0000

@Cristian,
I didn't get any of that. Can you be a little clearer?

By: cristian

cristian — Wed, 28 Sep 2011 07:53:56 +0000

All of you have really great opinions, coming from many different perspectives, well here is mine; if it is meant to be that someone buys that product and does not benefits then your words would fit well with the truth of the outcome of having a tachyon product, now if the person does benefit then what you have said is structured with the perspective resembling that of a limited view orientation. If everything exists then nothing exists, so in a place where we create it would be wise to chose a brighter more illuminated direction of possibility for yourself and others. The possibility of something working against all odds is there when the definition of odds is seem as different creative intent. It is silly to even buy objects that would do something for you when everything can be done with the mind and most people that search for such things are aware of that, but people have trouble remaining with clarity that you may only find on rare occasion, and might be attracted to buying such items. Thank you and may all you find that clarity in your own structure of liquid crystal

By: db

db — Wed, 01 Jun 2011 01:11:57 +0000

@Delneter,

Science and academia haven't proven or cured jacksh** in all these years

You go, girl! It doesn't get much smaller-minded than that.

By: Delneter

Delneter — Tue, 31 May 2011 17:45:29 +0000

So the officially recognized dumbasses have a problem with the unofficial dumbasses peddling science that has not been given their seal of approval? All science is is a bunch of theories that either cannot ever possibly be proven or "are yet undiscovered". The tachyon crowd has just as much proof of their theories as the scientists and professors have - you are just educated fools versus these uneducated ones. Science and academia haven't proven or cured jacksh** in all these years, so shut the hell up and let someone else postulate some BULLSHIT for a change!

By: Milo

Milo — Sun, 20 Jun 2010 21:25:19 +0000

@Mike

As Dmitry already pointed out, the Science Channel and the like are not necessarily good sources of scientific information. Contrary to what one might think, their audience is generally made up of people who do not like science. They like what they THINK is science. They like watching cars explode and divers dodge sharks. They don't like watching six-months of uneventful trekking across a desert, taking soil-samples every 10-kilometres, followed by months of endless experimentation, followed by more months of sitting at a computer analyzing data, ultimately finding absolutely nothing and having to start all over again.

If you want to know what is really going on in science, pick up a journal or two. Attend lectures and conferences. Seek out all of the "boring" stuff they never show on television.

By: db

db — Thu, 03 Jun 2010 16:13:14 +0000

@Mike, This is what happens when you get your science education from the Science Channel. Regarding black holes, Einstein's equations work perfectly in the interior of a black hole. In fact, the first exact solution to Einstein's field equations (discovered by Schwarzschild) precisely describes a non-rotating black hole. Where Einstein's equations fail (where, in fact, all of current physics fails) is at the singularity of the black hole (at the very center). But just because our current theories fail at the center of a black hole doesn't mean they're wrong. It means that our current theories are a good approximation to the "true" laws of physics that are undiscovered as of yet. So how are Einstein's theories not "science"? He saw that the physical laws of his day were no longer sufficient to explain the mounting experimental evidence (namely that light travels at the same speed relative to all observers), and he formulated a theory that incorporated and reconciled this evidence with earlier classical theories. Every single test of the predictions of the Theory of Relativity has passed with astonishing accuracy. If that's not science, then you'll have to update me on what you think it is. By contrast, these "tachyon devices" are an obvious scam devised by a scam artist, not a scientist. It's so painfully obvious, that it's not worth anyone's time to perform any tests on them at all. Our time should be spent testing anything but this idiotic junk.

By: Mike

Mike — Thu, 03 Jun 2010 05:12:14 +0000

I tend to agree with Sam. I would rather something be done-even if it is wrong- than listen to what goes for science(which is actually just talk). I was watching the Science channel, and apparently Einstein's theory about gravity is wrong, because his equations don't work in a black hole. So, are we to believe that Einstein's theory on gravity is science? I think one of the main things we have to acknowledge is that our eyesight, hearing, sense of smell, probably touch, taste, etc. do not account for all that is out there(i.e., radio waves that we don't see; cadavers that we don't smell; high frequencies that we don't hear, etc.). I do think that real science is looking for the explanations of how what we perceive occurs. I would call the other(Einstein) theoretical science-which is very important in its own right, but beyond most of us.

By: db

db — Wed, 19 Aug 2009 02:06:26 +0000

@lily, It seems like you're almost on the right track, but you just can't take the full plunge into healthy skepticism regarding this nonsense. For instance, take your statement:

why do their “inventors” join the ranks of rank capitalists in sharing their stuff? If there are energetic processes that kill off every virus, save us from chemtrails and the nwo, cure cancer and aids and speed up our spiritual evolution why is the cost so damn high?

Really? You don't see why they are rank capitalists?! They're trying to make a quick buck by selling nothing to morons who will buy into anything! Is that so difficult to admit? These technologies and these "energetic processes" do nothing.

I also know that emf is probably dangerous because my commonsense tells me so. We are electrical, we are water, water vibrates, we are living on a magnetic earth, etc. I don’t have to know all the science.

Does your "commonsense" also tell you that the earth is flat? Your outright refusal to learn "all the science" is at the heart of the problem. It's science that tells us that EMF is not dangerous! Science is a field where you have to leave your "intuition" at the doorstep. But I guess you've got it all figured out.

I was seeing a homeopath and an acupuncturist who cured me of mono in two weeks

Mononucleosis is a self-limiting disease, and two weeks is a perfectly normal time for symptoms to subside. The quack practitioners did nothing.